Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Announcing Free Premium EDU Subscriptions

Today is a historic moment in time for PaperRater.  It represents the convergence of our mission with the work we have put in to offer accessible automated writing instruction.  We began this mission several years ago by unrolling our AI proofreading and plagiarism checker for free -- something unheard of at the time.  We take the next step on our journey today by publicly announcing a 100% free subscription to our premium service available to schools.  Teachers and students can now get state of the art grammar checking, plagiarism detection, automated scoring, and automated writing instruction for FREE.  To schools that are already paying for similar services, this represents an opportunity to save thousands of dollars per year.  For institutions that could not afford the excessive costs of automated proofreading and plagiarism check, we now provide a free way to tap into these benefits of an indispensable tool for the modern writer.

How it Works

Our EDU subscriptions reduce the hassle that schools typically encounter when setting up services for their classrooms.  Our system does not require any logins, student rosters, or admin accounts, yet still provides premium benefits to both students and teachers.

Better than Basic
The premium service allows you to submit longer documents, receive enhanced plagiarism detection, access premium-only modules, and more.  Competing companies are charging as much as $8 per document for these same premium-level benefits.  Your students and teachers can gain access to this technology for free. To get started, email us with your contact info, name of institution, and number of students; and we will provide you with all the info you need to begin using our premium service.






FAQs

Q:  What is the difference between the Free Premium and the Basic membership?
A:  For schools, both are free and ad-supported, but the Premium accepts longer documents, includes better plagiarism detection, and additional benefits listed here.

Q:  Are there limits on the size of the educational institution?
A:  We welcome schools of all sizes.  We work with high schools of 500 students and universities with 10,000 students.  All are welcome to signup.

Q:  This sounds neat, but I'm still confused by the whole thing.  What can I do to understand better how this works?
A:  If you are new to our service, please use our basic service first to understand how it works and what it does.  Missing premium features will be posted visibly throughout the basic service.  The Premium EDU subscription will function similarly to the basic service but with the premium benefits mentioned here.  More documentation on the Premium EDU service is here.

Q:  Are there any restrictions on which institutions can signup?
A:  This offer is for educational institutions and priority will be given to high schools, colleges, and universities within the United States and portions of Europe.


Additional Questions

Please don't hesitate to contact us with any additional questions that you have. 







Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Automated Essay Scoring Updates

Today, September 23rd, 2015, we are rolling out the most significant change to our Automated Essay Scoring system in its history.  This involves many improvements summarized below:

  • Enhanced usage of grammar features in our predictive models
  • Ensemble methods for increased accuracy and reduced variability
  • Elimination of length bias
  • Additional predictors
  • More uniform distribution of scores
  • Incorporation of other Machine Learning and NLP techniques...
Although these changes represent an improvement in our AES technology, we recognize that classrooms as well as individuals may track changes in a score on a thesis or other written work over time, and that these changes could disrupt that process.  To mitigate this issue and ease the transition, we are blending the scores from our previous AES model with scores generated using our new scoring models.  As always, we welcome any feedback on the new scoring system.

We hope to continue with another round of major enhancements to the automated grader in the summer of 2016 when it will likely be less disruptive to most users of our service.

Monday, September 21, 2015

Anatomy of a Plagiarism Checker


If you've ever wondered how our plagiarism checker works on the inside or what our originality score means, then this article is required reading.  The green plus icon and the "100% originality" are a wonderful reassurance for writers that submit their work to our service, but what does it mean?  Similarly, if you receive an Originality of 70%, should you be concerned? Each of these questions will be answered as we take a look under the hood of our plagiarism detector.


A Daunting Task

When we say that we are checking for plagiarism, we are attempting to discover if portions of the given text might have been taken from other previously written texts.  Fifty years ago a teacher may be concerned that a work was taken from a book, or perhaps from another student in the same class or from a class years earlier.  Today, there are many reasons to want a measure of a text's originality, and this task is as daunting as ever.  While our ability to process text has improved dramatically from the scenario fifty years ago, so has the availability of text to would be plagiarizers.  In fact, the text that is publicly available on the Internet already exceeds trillions of pages and continues to grow exponentially.  The task of plagiarism detection is all about finding the proverbial needle in the haystack.  

How It's Done

For the curious, precise details of storing and rapidly searching massive amounts of text can be found under the field of Information Retrieval.  But for our purposes, high level details will suffice.  As stated earlier, we wish to search trillions of documents efficiently, so we turn to the companies that already do exactly this -- search engines.  Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo maintain the software and thousands of computers necessary to track, store, and search the massively growing index of Internet content.  They offer to us the ability to search their content via an API.  By using their search APIs, we tap into their vast data stores without the overhead of attempting to crawl the entire Internet ourselves.  

Specifically, when a document comes into our plagiarism detection service, we chop it up into small snippets of text and run a sample of those snippets through the search APIs. Consider the following snippets pulled from a paper on Abraham Lincoln:

  • Lincoln grew up on the western frontier in Kentucky
  • confronted Radical Republicans, who demanded harsher treatment of the South
  • remaining land he held in Kentucky in
  • became an able and successful lawyer with a reputation as a formidable
  • compensation for the owners, enforcement to capture fugitive slaves
  • ....
Imagine pulling 100 snippets from this document and then running a Google phrase search on each of these snippets.  How many of the 100 snippets would match a document on the Internet?  Since these excerpts of text come from the Wikipedia page, we would expect all (or nearly all) of them to have at least that page in the search results.  If these excerpts came from a completely original source, then we would expect all of the search results to come back with no matches (or perhaps a few false positives).  This is approximately the approach taken by our plagiarism detection service.  The originality score that you receive is represented by this simple formula:

1 - (Number of Searches with Matches / Total Number of Searches)

According to this formula, the originality is 0% when all of the searches have matches, which is exactly what we expect. Now this is a simplified overview of what is actually a much more complicated process, but it conveys a general appreciation of the methodology used at PaperRater.


Checking Against Past Submissions

One question we receive from time to time is whether past submissions are used in calculating the originality score.  The answer is 'No', but this deserves an explanation.  Sites like TurnItIn bank previous submissions and check against these in addition to using search APIs.  This creates concerns for false positives as well as privacy that we would rather avoid.  Imagine submitting an original paper to our service before you turn it in and then being accused of plagiarism when your teacher checks it with the same service one week later.  Rest assured that PaperRater checks papers using only the search APIs.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Sentence Beginnings


Just how do we start that perfect sentence? It can be a tough decision. Sentence beginnings are like first impressions, and we want to make sure they’re right. And while there’s no single correct way to start a sentence, we need to vary them to ensure our writing doesn’t get stale or boring.

So, what makes a bad sentence beginning anyway? Are there rules? Well, no, but let’s look at some examples of how repeated simple sentence openings can become stilted and tough to read. For example:

John went to the store. Anthony went with him. They bought food and drinks. They bought flowers for John’s mother. The man at the cash register smiled at them and gave them a discount. They returned home and put away the groceries.

What do all these sentence beginnings have in common? As we can see, each one consists of a noun followed by a verb. Unfortunately, these simple sentences quickly become boring, decreasing the impact of our writing. Let’s see what happens when we vary them a bit.

John and Anthony went to the store, where they bought food, drinks, and flowers for John’s mother. Smiling, the man at the cash register gave them a discount. Returning home, the two put the groceries away.

See how much better this flows? Here, we’ve left the simple noun-verb structure for the first sentence, but, in the second, we’ve used “smiling” as a participial or transitional word. And in the third, we’ve emphasized the action of returning home, rather than the two boys.

Let’s look at some other ways to rearrange simple sentence beginnings (e.g. common noun-verb constructions) and add some variety to our work. Remember, our goal here is not only to minimize the use of simple sentence openings - it’s to become better writers!

Example #1


The dog barked with great ferocity.

With great ferocity, the dog barked.

Here, we’ve placed “with great ferocity” at the top of the sentence. Notice how it highlights the action of the dog barking rather than the dog itself.

Example #2


The car’s engine made a loud boom from around the corner.

From around the corner came the loud boom of the car’s engine.

Here, we’ve rearranged the sentence so the initial subject (the car’s engine) is placed at the end. The second sentence highlights a location and a sound rather than the car’s engine.

Example #3


Billy stayed home from school, sad about the loss of his grandmother.

Sad about the loss of his grandmother, Billy stayed home from school.

Here, we’ve started with an adjective. In a normal noun-verb sentence opening, the adjective would follow, rather than lead, the noun and verb.

Example #4


Briana danced the night away.

Here we have a very simple sentence, which may work well. However, you could try adding a present or past participle to the beginning, describing a little more action or detail.

Laughing at her own silliness, Briana danced the night away.

Not only does it paint a better picture, it breaks up the noun-verb opening.

Example #5


The furious man shook his fist at the car turning the corner.

Enraged, the man shook his fist at the car turning the corner.

In this example, we can actually leave the sentence intact, but add a transitional word or phrase to the front for little variety.

We can also try this with an adverb.

Furiously, the man shook his fist at the car turning the corner.

Or, an appositive.

A furious old man, Robert shook his fist at the car turning the corner.

Example 6


Now, let’s synthesize some of the above examples in the context of a full paragraph. First, let’s read a paragraph made of simple noun-verb sentence openings.

Jacob ran into the street. Anne met him. They ran together down the block. Their shoes flew off the pavement. A car passed by and nearly hit them. They didn’t care. They held hands and kept running. They swerved out of the street and onto the grass. They each grabbed onto the giant oak tree trunk and climbed up. They sat there, catching their breath.

Did you notice that you started to tune out while reading? While the actions described in this paragraph are clear, we lose interest, because each sentence has the same structure.

Anne and Jacob met in the street and ran together down the block, shoes flying off the pavement. Around the corner came the car, nearly hitting them, but they held hands and kept running. Suddenly, they swerved out of the street and onto the grass. Up the giant oak tree they climbed, then sat there, catching their breath.

See how this paragraph keeps our attention? Varied sentence beginnings emphasize different actions and locations, whereas a simple noun-verb construction always emphasizes the subject.

Our goal is to keep our sentences diverse, which makes for more interesting reading. Remember, sentence beginnings (and sentence structure in general) create a tone and rhythm for the reader - and that tone is as important as the content itself!

For more modules and other helpful instructional writing pieces, visit our blog at: http://blog.paperrater.com/.

PaperRater’s FREE Plagiariam and Grammar Checker


Remember to visit http://paperrater.com/ for our FREE plagiarism and grammar checking tool. Get detailed reports on all your writing, including grammar, readability, transitional phrase reports - and even a comprehensive “grade” on any piece of writing!

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Passive Voice vs Active Voice

Passive Voice



Passive Voice module of essay checker
English and grammar teachers love to tell their students to use the active voice because it tends to make sentences shorter, clearer, and more impactful.


But is it a crime to write in the passive voice? Absolutely not. In many cases, the passive voice is actually preferable to the active voice. However, it does present many dangers that could make our writing wordy or unclear. Let’s define the active and passive voices, then discuss some potential problems with passive writing.


Examples of Active and Passive Voices



Whether a sentence is active or passive depends on the relationship between the verb and the subject. In the active voice, a subject performs a verb. For example:


Barry Bonds hit 762 home runs.


Barry Bonds (subject) hit (verb) 762 home runs (object).


In the passive voice, the subject is switched, so the object of the active sentence becomes the subject of the passive sentence.


762 home runs were hit by Barry Bonds.


Unlike the subject in the active voice, the subject in the passive voice does nothing. In other words, the subject, home runs, takes no action. Instead, the home runs are acted upon.


Another example of an active sentence:


My parents bought groceries for my sister’s birthday party.


The subject of the sentence, the parents, performs the action of buying groceries. The parents are the focus of the sentence.


However, in the passive voice, the subject is switched, so the object of the active sentence becomes the subject in the passive.


Groceries were bought by my parents for my sister’s birthday party.


The subject, or focus, of the sentence takes no action. Instead, the groceries are acted upon by the parents.


Problems with Passive Voice



A passive voice can create confusion; it often disrupts rhythm and makes a sentence harder to understand. In many cases, verbs and subjects become vague or ambiguous.


Evidence was presented to support the idea that homelessness is experienced by more than 600,000 people.


A couple questions: Who is presenting this evidence? And how is the number of homeless people an idea? Also, because the subject, the evidence, doesn’t perform any action, the sentence is inherently confusing.


Let’s clarify this sentence with a few simple fixes:


The U.S. Census Bureau estimated the number of homeless people at 600,000.


Here, the U.S. Census Bureau becomes the subject who drives the estimation of the number of homeless people. The focus of the sentence has shifted, creating a simple, straightforward structure. Another example:


A talk was given by the college professor; she cited a paper that said homelessness went down last year.


Again, the subject of the sentence, the “talk,” doesn’t do anything. Here, the passive voice creates a clunky break that requires a semicolon to keep the sentence grammatically correct. The subject of the first part of the sentence is the “talk,” but the talk doesn’t cite the paper, the professor does. See how confusing the subject can become in a passive sentence?


The college professor cited a paper stating homelessness decreased last year.


By changing the subject of the sentence to the doer of the action (the college professor), we get a simple, easy to read statement.


How to Identify the Passive Voice



The easiest way to identify the passive voice is to look for the following in any sentence:


passive voice = form of “to be” + past participle (verb)


A past participle is a verb that takes the past tense form. Look for it in conjunction with a form of “to be,” which usually includes words like is, are, am, was, were, has been, have been, had been, will be, will have been, and being.


Also, look for the need to attribute the perceived doer of action with the word “by.”


When the car was driven by the racer, he sped out of control and hit the guardrail.


Reasons to Use the Passive Voice



Remember, we want our writing to be clear. So when we talk about passive versus active voices, keep in mind that either voice can work, depending on the situation.


Here are a few occasions where the passive voice may be preferable to the active voice:


  1. When the agent is more important than the subject. Take the example: “My car was hit.” We want to focus on the car itself, since we care more about the car being damaged than we do about who damaged the car.
  2. When the agent of action is a secret or an authoritative figure. Take common disclaimers like “Trespassers will be prosecuted,” or “Access is denied.”
  3. When we want variety in our writing. Any kind of writing, no matter how active, tends to grow dull after awhile. Sentence rhythm and structure will feel stilted and repetitive, especially when each sentence is focused only on the drivers of action.


How can PaperRater help you construct more active sentences?


Use our free essay checker today and receive a full report on all your writing, including grammar correction, plagiarism checker, and a “Passive Voice” analysis that automatically scans your document for passive sentence constructions. Instantly improve your writing today with PaperRater’s FREE electronic spelling, grammar, word choice, vocabulary and style grades!